The Needs of Standardized CLIL Assessment in Indonesia
Abstrak
CLIL is a beneficial in education especially in primary education, since by its dual-focused teaching and learning approach used in which the main language of teaching and learning are used foreign language for promoting both content mastery and language acquisition to pre-defined levels. The study was aimed to investigate the extent can the assessment practiced be used to evaluate students’ English performance. The findings revealed that the assessment practiced was not adequate to be used to assess students’ English performance. The current research suggested that the teachers have to make sure to involves four basic language skills in developing assessment instruments
Keywords: Assessment, CLIL, Standardized
Referensi
Aiello, J., Di Martino, E., & Di Sabato, B. (2017). Preparing teachers in Italy for CLIL: Reflections on assessment, language performance and willingness to communicate. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(1), 69–83, DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2015.104187.
Barbero, T. (2012). Assessment in CLIL, in Järvinen H. (ed.), Language in Content Instruction, University of Turku. European Commission. https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi/org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Bell, N. D., & Lorenzi, D. (2004). Facilitating second language acquisition in elementary and secondary physical education classes. Journal of Physical Education Recreation and Dance, 75(6), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2004.10607257.
Briggs, M., Woodfield A., Martin C., & Swatton P., (2008). Assessment for Learning and Teaching. Learning Matters, Exeter.
Coyle, D., P. Hood & D. Marsh (2010).CLIL. Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publication Asia-Pacific Inc. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Eurydice. (2006). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at School in Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
Fitriani, Ika. (2016) Grass root’s Voices on the CLIL Implementation in Tertiary Education. Dinamika Ilmu, 16(2): 211-220.
Graaff, R., Koopman, G.J. & Tanner, R. (2012). Integrated opportunities for subject and language learning. Implementing a rubric for cross-curricular learning activities. Quality Interfaces: Examining Evidence and Exploring Solutions in CLIL. Eds. D. Marsh and O. Meyer. Eichstaett: Eichstaett Academic Press. 154-173.
Hönig, Ingrid (2010). Assessment in CLIL: Theoretical and Empirical Research. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag.
Lasagabaster, David & Sierra, Juan Manuel (2010). Immersion and CLIL in English: more differences than similarities. ELT Jounal. 64 (4), 367-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp082
Lin, A. M. Y. (2015). Conceptualising the potential role of L1 in CLIL.Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 74–89.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000926.
Massler, U., Stotz, D., & Queisser, C. (2014). Assessment instruments for primary CLIL: The conceptualization and evaluation of test tasks. Language Learning Journal, 42, 137–150.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.891371.
Mehisto, P. (2008). CLIL Counterweights: Recognizing and Decreasing Disjuncture in CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal, 1, 96-117. Retrieved June, 02, 2008 from http://www.icrj.eu/11/article8.html
Pérez-Cañado.(2012). CLIL research in Europe: past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315-341, https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.630064
Rachmajanti, S., Zen, E.L., Apriana A. (2015). Using English in science class as an attempt to maximizing input in second language learning. Vietnam: TESOL Conference 2015.
http://www.vnseameo.org/TESOLConference2015/.
Rohmah, I.I.T., Saleh, M., Faridi, A., Fitriati, S.W. (2019) Language Assessment
Pattern for Primary Education in the Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classroom Context, Asian EFL Journal, 21(2.2), 101-123.
https://www.elejournals.com/asian-efl-journal/asian-efl-journal-volume-21-issue-22-march-2019/
Rohmah, I.I.T. (2019). The feasibility and effectiveness of integrating content knowledge and english competences for assessing english proficiency in CLIL. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal): 10(1), 65-73. http://journal.upgris.ac.id/index.php/eternal/index
Rohmah, I. I. T., Saleh, M., Faridi, A., & Fitriati, S.W. (2020). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL):Teachers’ Point of View, Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Education: 594-600, http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.28-9-2019.2291094
Ross, S. (2005). The impact of assessment method on foreign language performance growth. Applied Linguistics, 26 (3), 317-342. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami011
Serragiotto, Graziano (2007). Assessment and evaluation in CLIL. In D. Marsh & D. Wolff (eds). Diverse Contexts – Converging Goals. CLIL in Europe (271-283). Frankfurt Main: Peter Lang.
Sierra, Cecilia. (2007). Assessing CLIL at primary school: a longitudinal study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 582-602. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb461.0
Várkuti, A. (2010). Linguistic benefits of the CLIL approach: Measuring linguistic competences. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(3), 67–79.
Wewer, Taina (2013). English language assessment in bilingual CLIL instruction at primary level in Finland: Quest for updated and valid assessment methods. ZeitschriftfürInterkulturellenFremdsprachenunterricht18 (2), 76-87. http://zif.spz.tu-darmstadt.de/jg-18-2/beitrag/Wewer.pdf.
